Language → validated result
A user's sentence becomes a structured strategy specification, passes validation gates, generates code in a sandbox, runs a backtest on market data, and returns results — one agent turn, no human in the loop.
01 Work
We don't just advise on agents; we build and operate them. A commissioned agent product delivered into production with live users, and internal agent systems running daily inside our own trading operation — where an unreliable system costs real money.
02 Delivered engagement
Commissioned by an external team: an LLM agent that turns one plain-language sentence into a validated, backtested trading strategy. Designed, built, deployed, and operated end-to-end by AOTC AI — the engagement model on our Approach page, delivered.
A user's sentence becomes a structured strategy specification, passes validation gates, generates code in a sandbox, runs a backtest on market data, and returns results — one agent turn, no human in the loop.
Queued workers, sandboxed code execution, schema-validated agent outputs, rate limiting, live monitoring, and failure paths that degrade gracefully — serving real users on modest infrastructure.
The product is live at osq.aotc-ai.com — not a landing page: the actual agent, in production, delivered in 2026 and operated by AOTC AI since.
03 Internal systems
Our trading operation runs on agents we built: automated research pipelines, live market-event capture with watchdogs and failover, and data-ingestion agents that reconcile vendor feeds daily. They run unattended in live markets — an environment that does not forgive silent failures.
Every reliability practice we sell — instrumentation, fallbacks, escalation paths, testing against live edge cases — exists because our own money depended on it first.
04 Worked example
A representative mid-market scenario — shown to make the method concrete, not a client reference.
An operations team reconciles counterparty statements against internal records every morning: multiple formats, frequent exceptions, two staff-days daily, and the real rules — which breaks matter, who to chase, when to escalate — live in two senior operators' heads.
Our team sits with those operators for two weeks, capturing the exception taxonomy and decision rules as a testable specification — the latent knowledge that makes the workflow actually work.
An agent ingests statements in every live format, matches and classifies breaks against the captured rules, drafts the chase correspondence, and escalates low-confidence cases to a human queue — instrumented so every decision is auditable.
After parallel-running against the manual process to measured agreement, the agent takes the morning run. Source, runbooks, and dashboards are handed over at a one-time cost — the team keeps the exceptions queue, drops the grind.
05 Next
Bring it to a free 45-minute diagnostic — we'll map the workflow, locate the latent knowledge, and tell you honestly whether an agent fits.